Wisconsin Indian Tribe Prevails – State Cannot Ban Electronic Poker on Reservation

Wisconsin Indian Tribe Prevails – State Cannot Ban Electronic Poker on Reservation

Wisconsin Indian Tribe Prevails – State Cannot Ban Electronic Poker on Reservation

May 6, 2015

Wisconsin Indian Tribe Prevails – State Cannot Ban Electronic Poker on Reservation

By: Ifrah Law

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has overturned a federal district court ruling that had permitted the State of Wisconsin to prohibit the Ho Chunk tribe from offering electronic poker on its reservation although such games are not explicitly and uniformly prohibited in that state.  This ruling may have implications for the ability of tribes to offer online poker – an issue that is subject of intense focus in the State of California.

The case focused on the ability of states to regulate the offering of certain forms of gaming by Native American tribes in the United States. Generally speaking, tribes’ ability to do so is regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). Under IGRA, traditional poker – in which players compete against each other, and not against the house – is a “nonbanked card game” that is defined as Class II gaming. Unlike Class III gaming (a catch-all category that includes most casino games), the ability of States to regulate Class II gaming is extremely limited.  This is especially true in states like Wisconsin in which poker is not explicitly prohibited.

The decision obviously benefits the Ho Chunk tribe, but it also may assist the litigation prospects of the Santa Ysabel tribe in California. The Santa Ysabel have offered bingo online, and have stated their intention to offer online poker as well. The State of California has sued the tribe asking that the Court enjoin them from offering bingo. The tribe currently has a motion to dismiss pending, but the question of whether online poker would be treated as Class II gaming under IGRA figures to be an important issue in the case. The Seventh Circuit decision will undoubtedly provide some support for the tribe’s position that online poker is Class II gaming, and that States are severely limited in their ability to restrict tribes’ offering of such games.

Online poker providers are obviously closely watching these lawsuits. A court decision squarely holding that online poker is a Class II game under IGRA could provide an outlet for offering online poker in conjunction with federally recognized tribes. As the industry watches the California legislature’s deliberations over online poker, the federal courts’ rulings on the application of IGRA figure to play a prominent role.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Online Casino + Poker Posts
Are Lottery Courier Services the Next Big Thing?
Ifrah on iGaming |
Mar 19, 2024

Are Lottery Courier Services the Next Big Thing?

By: Steven Eichorn
Maryland Report Supports iGaming Expansion – Should More States Start to Consider Legalization?
Ifrah on iGaming |
Nov 17, 2023

Maryland Report Supports iGaming Expansion – Should More States Start to Consider Legalization?

By: Sara Dalsheim
ADA Accessibility Guidance for the iGaming Industry
Ifrah on iGaming |
Apr 5, 2022

ADA Accessibility Guidance for the iGaming Industry

By: Jake Gray
Ifrah Law on NFTs: Blockchain Gaming and Gambling Compliance
Ifrah on iGaming |
Feb 9, 2022

Ifrah Law on NFTs: Blockchain Gaming and Gambling Compliance

By: Jake Gray

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights